Thank you Scott,

Comments inline.

Regards,
Gustavo

On 2/28/20, 07:17, "regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott" 
<[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]> wrote:

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: regext <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
    > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 10:01 AM
    > To: regext <[email protected]>
    > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-
    > spec
    > 
    > The following working group document is believed to be ready for
    > submission to the IESG for publication as an Informational document:
    > 
    > 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dregext-2Dtmch-2Dfunc-2Dspec_&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=VbweciUcwYQpIOZDSxl0ezGd1hGDtd-0BvgAgfmwfE0&m=gChL047ncZhA5g-WHSBuzKDgXtyQQkPxKa1UV6_b_R4&s=Pd6hP_3xoBBmLnpmZwuxkp6BkY5qS9B6saWNRBvNP_A&e=
 
    > 
    > This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 28 February 2020.
    > 
    > Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is
    > sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document by replying 
to
    > this message on the list.
    
    +1, but I do see some minor issues in Section 10, IANA Considerations:
    
    1. "One URI assignment have been registered by the IANA", but two 
assignments are requested. That text should say "Two URI assignments have been 
registered by the IANA".

GL- Fixed in version 07, here: 
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-07.txt

    
    2. It's been a recent convention to include "epp" in the URNs, e.g. 
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:<identifier>" vs. 
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:<identifier>". It may be worth noting somewhere why 
that convention isn't being followed here. Perhaps there are existing 
implementations that would be difficult to change?

GL- There are existing implementations that would be extremely difficult to 
change. The first version of this draft is from March 2013, and the draft was 
developed while the TMCH implementation was ongoing.
    

    3. The schema URN is incorrect. "URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:tmNotice-1.0" 
should be "URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:tmNotice-1.0".

GL- Fixed in version 07, here: 
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-07.txt

    
    Scott
    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    [email protected]
    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_regext&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=VbweciUcwYQpIOZDSxl0ezGd1hGDtd-0BvgAgfmwfE0&m=gChL047ncZhA5g-WHSBuzKDgXtyQQkPxKa1UV6_b_R4&s=9GzrIKxLZqhDIkAOSL0bAmHsu1UZD1ywJjm1hO2JZTc&e=
 
    

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to