Il 31/07/2020 16:10, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Loffredo <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 9:49 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-regext-
rdap-reverse-search
Hi Scott,
Il 31/07/2020 15:21, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Loffredo <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 9:03 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] IANA Considerations in
draft-ietf-regext- rdap-reverse-search
Hi Scott,
thanks a lot for your feddback.
Please find my comments to your feedback below.
Il 31/07/2020 14:29, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search currently states that "This
document
has no actions for IANA". I believe that's primarily because there's
nothing new or different being returned in the search results, which
is where RDAP servers describe the features they support.
Exactly.
There is, however, a case to be made for registering a value in the
RDAP
extensions registry: a response to a help query (or any other query)
can be used to indicate that the server supports reverse search. I'd
like to suggest this change for Section 7:
OLD:
This document has no actions for IANA.
NEW:
IANA is requested to register the following value in the RDAP
Extensions
Registry:
Extension identifier: reverse_search_1_0 (or whatever makes sense)
Registry operator: Any Published specification: This document.
Contact: IESG <[email protected]>
Intended usage: This extension describes reverse search query
patterns
for RDAP.
Scott
I agree.
Furthermore, my opinion is that Section 4.1 of RFC7483bis should be
updated to treat this use case. I mean, a server should signal in
rdapConformance not only the extensions used in building the response
but all the supported features.
So maybe this?
OLD:
The data structure named "rdapConformance" is an array of strings, each
providing a hint as to the specifications used in the construction of the
response.
NEW:
The data structure named "rdapConformance" is an array of strings, each
providing a hint as to the specifications that describe the query and response
formats supported by the server.
Scott
How about "query and response extensions" ?
That would exclude the core protocol specifications. Is this better?
"The data structure named "rdapConformance" is an array of strings, each of which
describes a query or response specification supported by the server."
OK. I wrote "extensions" in my previous message to mean "in addition to
rdap_level_0".
Mario
Scott
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Systems and Technological Development Unit
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Mobile: +39.3462122240
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
