Agree with Patrick's points about rdapConformance in the help response 
informing about all capabilities and rdapConformance being more specific for a 
particular query response.

Jasdip 

On 7/31/20, 12:29 PM, "regext on behalf of Patrick Mevzek" 
<regext-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of p...@dotandco.com> wrote:

    On Fri, Jul 31, 2020, at 11:21, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
    > Note "supported extensions". This is why I'm saying that we need to 
    > register all extensions with IANA
    
    I agree.
    
    > and include them in the 
    > rdapConformance data structure even if they don't describe a response 
    > extension. 
    
    I agree, everything should be listed in the reply to an help query.
    
    I am just saying that for any other reply that is a specific one on a 
specific resource
    then the rdapConformance should just list the "extensions" needed to 
understand this
    specific response, and not list absolutely all extensions the server knows 
about
    (and that are irrelevant for this specific response).
    
    The list of what is written in the response should certainly not be just 
server policy,
    especially if there is no automated way to learn about this policy. 
Otherwise if you include
    options like that (the list presented might be the list of all server 
extensions OR only the subset needed for this specific response) AND there is 
no way for the client to know which
    case he is in, it immediately creates interoperability problems. I prefer 
no such options
    and the protocol clearly defining the content. Or if such options are 
really needed
    (if help response is always all extensions, and any other response is just 
the specific extensions needed, then nothing more is needed), there should be  
a signal to know which
    case we are in.
    
    > The help response should include supported 
    > extensions that are available to that client.
    
    Yes, the help response allows to "discover" all possible extensions from a 
specific client.
    
    -- 
      Patrick Mevzek
      p...@dotandco.com
    
    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    regext@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
    

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to