Scott Thank you for your reply, look below for EV>
-----Original Message----- From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 16:54 To: Eric Vyncke <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT) > -----Original Message----- > From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 8:39 AM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Mario Loffredo <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext- > rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT) > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content > is safe. > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) [SAH] [snip] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work put into this document. I found the document clear > and easy to read. > > Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would > be appreciated), and some nits. > > I hope that this helps to improve the document, > > Regards, > > -éric > > == COMMENTS == > > -- Section 2 -- > Please use BCP14 template (cfr RFC 8714). [SAH] Will fix. > -- Section 3.1.1 -- > CIDR RFC 4632 only applies to IPv4... and also uses the words 'prefix length' > rather than 'bitmask length'. [SAH] Do you know of an appropriate reference for IPv6? I can change "bitmask length" to "prefix length". EV> let's use indeed 'prefix length" as it is also used in RFC 4632 > "2001:db8::0" is not following the RFC 5952 that is RECOMMENDED just a > couple of paragraphs above ;-) [SAH] Please explain. What's needed for a fix? EV> simply use "2001:db8::" ;-) > == NITS == > > Like Ben Kaduk, I wonder why using a 16-bit value for US-ASCII "('*', US-ASCII > value 0x002A)"... [SAH] Will fix. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
