Hi.

I agree with Andy that there is no benefit in holding back this I-D from the 
IESG submission. If possible, would like my previous note on this subject 
addressed though. :)

Thanks,
Jasdip

On 6/26/23, 10:39 AM, "regext on behalf of Andrew Newton" 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:49 AM James Galvin <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> The Chairs would also like to note that given the new discussion regarding 
> jCard vs jsContact vs SimpleContact, that we will be delaying the actual 
> submission of this document to the IESG until that discussion resolves. It 
> seems prudent to make sure there is no impact to the “redacted” document as a 
> result of the format discussion before we submit it to the IESG.

I appreciate the prudence, and practically it may not matter if
submission to the IESG is delayed given the dependency on JSONPath and
IESG workload. That said, I do not believe this is necessary. Let me
explain.

Much of the complexity in the RDAP redaction spec has to do with
getting around weird things in jCard, but as Marc has pointed out,
jCard will be with us for the foreseeable future. Though I strongly
suspect redaction will be easier with a theoretical SimpleContact, it
could be quite some time before we know that. And the RDAP redaction
spec covers more than contact data, so it is useful outside of the
contact data discussions.

The complications with redaction with regard to JSContact center
around client processing of JSContact patch objects before, after or
during client processing of the redaction directives. This is
something the JSContact drafts could specify without need to modify
the RDAP redaction, IMHO. I believe the UID issue has been resolved.
Finally, JSContact may take some time to get to the publication point
considering its dependency.

That's my opinion. Maybe others see it differently.

-andy

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to