> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew (andy) Newton <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 3:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] unicode assignables and RDAP extensions > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Hi, > > draft-bray-unichars [1], which is currently in IESG evaluation, describes > Unicode subsets and the problems with just allowing anything Unicode in a > text protocol. > > This doc describes "unicode assignables" as the "subset as all the Unicode > code > points that are not problematic." > > I think it would be a good idea for the RDAP extensions draft to also limit > RDAP > extension identifiers, object class names, and JSON property names to the > "unicode assignables" subset. > > What do people think?
[SAH] Good idea! Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
