+1, but I don't think extension draft is enough. It will cover only extension identifiers, object class names, and JSON property names of future extension. Adding it to extension draft is easy and likely not harmful in any way though.

Much more interesting would be indeed the string values in responses. For this we would need a bis of RFC 9083, which would then automatically cover all aspects of the protocol, not only future extensions.

If I think we have a real problem to solve at hand, that needs such action and is worth effort: no. If we ever decide to do 9083bis out of other reasons it would be then no brainer to add it.

Kind Regards,

Pawel

On 21.05.25 21:43, Jasdip Singh wrote:

*From: *Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>
*Date: *Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 3:24 PM
*To: *[email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
*Subject: *[regext] Re: unicode assignables and RDAP extensions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew (andy) Newton <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 3:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] unicode assignables and RDAP extensions
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> Hi,
>
> draft-bray-unichars [1], which is currently in IESG evaluation, describes > Unicode subsets and the problems with just allowing anything Unicode in a
> text protocol.
>
> This doc describes "unicode assignables" as the "subset as all the Unicode code
> points that are not problematic."
>
> I think it would be a good idea for the RDAP extensions draft to also limit RDAP > extension identifiers, object class names, and JSON property names to the
> "unicode assignables" subset.
>
> What do people think?

[SAH] Good idea!

[JS] +1

Since that draft suggests “restricting the contents of object member names and string values to one of the subsets”, beside naming, should we also limit string values in the JSON responses for an RDAP extension?

Jasdip


_______________________________________________
regext mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to