I support adoption of this draft. Ar Mer, 13 Awst 2025 am 14:07 Maarten Wullink <maarten.wullink= [email protected]> ysgrifennodd:
> i think the document is ready for adoption. > > This may make life easier for the client, but the server must now include > more data in the response even if clients don’t care to use the Link headers > For the next version maybe it would be nice to figure out how to make the > Links header response optional for GET requests, maybe client does > signaling using mime-type? > > - > Maarten > > > > Op 13 aug 2025, om 13:09 heeft Gavin Brown <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > I should add that this document has previously been presented to the WG > (in Dublin last year), where I feel it was well received. It has also been > discussed on the list, and again I believe the discussion was positive. I > am not aware of any objections to the WG taking this document on. > > Thanks, > > Gavin. > > On 12 Aug 2025, at 15:08, Gavin Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings, > > I would like to ask the WG to consider adopting this document: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brown-rdap-referrals/ > > Many thanks for your consideration! > > G. > > -- > Gavin Brown > Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > https://www.icann.org > > > -- > Gavin Brown > Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > https://www.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
