Hi Scott, > On 15 Aug 2025, at 19:32, Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > > [snip] > >> RFC 8982 may or may not provide the model, but we will need a document in >> either case. If the WG adopts this document, it can be developed with the >> input >> and guidance of the WG. > > [SAH] We already have a document in 8982. I'd like to understand if this > draft solves a problem that isn't solved by 8982.
RFC 8982 only applies to search queries. That's clunky but presumably we don't care too much about that. It may be that all this document needs to do is standardize the value of the "fieldSet" parameter. Unless clients and servers agree on that, there can be no interoperability. G. -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
