Hi, Apologies for my delay in addressing the IESG feedback to the revised charter.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-regext/ballot/ The feedback was substantial and specific that we should attempt to modernize the charter to match the current IESG thinking on well crafted charters. I've done my best to address their comments: https://github.com/ietf-artarea/charters/pull/55 ``` The Registration Protocols Extensions working group (REGEXT) is chartered to coordinate and standardize extensions to the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) and the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP). The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP, STD 69) is the standard application-layer client-server protocol for the provisioning and management of objects stored in a shared central repository. The Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP, STD 95) is the standard for retrieving registration data and metadata from both Domain Name Registries (DNRs) and Regional Internet Registries (RIRs). The working group may publish proposed standard and experimental extensions to EPP and RDAP. The working group may publish informational and best current practice documents for EPP and RDAP. The working group may revise the registration procedures for the EPP and RDAP registries. The working group will discuss new registrations with the designated experts for the EPP and RDAP registries. When the working group is closed, the mailing list will remain open and available for the use of the expert review process. A primary goal of the working group is to ensure the profiles and extensions are easily discoverable and understood, and to avoid duplicate effort that could harm interoperability. In addition to publishing extensions, the working group may publish proposed standards addressing interoperability issues that are adjacent to EPP and RDAP. For example: * Data formats for files exchanged between registration entities that need insertion in or extraction from EPP or RDAP. * The specification of application transport protocols for EPP based on existing RFCs. The working group does not have fixed deliverables, as it is a maintenance group that publishes extensions as they are needed by the RDAP and EPP communities. ``` I will leave the PR up for review, and discussion on this list for as long as the chairs would like. I will do my best to capture any proposed text changes sent to the list, but I welcome others who are comfortable with GitHub to raise suggestions directly on behalf of others. After the list feels comfortable with the proposed changes, which I will leave to the chairs to confirm. I will publish the revised charter to the data tracker and work with the IESG to see if their feedback has been addressed. Regards, OS, ART AD
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
