Hi, Its been silent for a while on https://github.com/ietf-artarea/charters/pull/55
I have applied the suggestions. Are there any objections to my taking these changes without diving into "profiles"? If not, please send text to the list for discussion. Regards, OS, ART AD On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:13 AM Pawel Kowalik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Orie, > > For RDAP profile is (or can be) an extension same time. Extension > mechanism is used as signalling in this case. > > See 2.1.1 of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions. > > From this perspective the WG does not make protocol profiling as such but > mechanisms needed for profiling were coped with so far. > > Kind Regards, > > Pawel > On 16.09.25 15:38, Orie wrote: > > Excellent point. > > Would it not be easier to remove the word profile though? > > Have we ever done profiles in this WG before? > > Why should profiles be in scope? > > Regards, > > OS > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 4:53 AM Maarten Wullink <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Orie, >> >> >> Minor comment here, >> >> > >> > >> > A primary goal of the working group is to ensure the profiles and >> extensions are easily discoverable and understood, and to avoid duplicate >> effort that could harm interoperability. >> > >> >> This is the first and only mention a the “profile” concept, and it is >> used in the context of the primary goal of the wg. >> Does this not warrant some additional text describing what a profile is >> or adding a line saying what profile related wg activities are in scope? >> >> Regards, >> Maarten > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
