Hi,

I have the following comments:

152        for both syntactic and semantic correctness.  For example, IETF
153        namespaces should be reserved for IETF specifications.

This should be changed to:

    IETF namespaces MUST be reserved for IETF specifications.

I think we should also add the following:

    Extensions and any normative reference necessary to implement the extension
    MUST NOT be denoted with "work in-progress" or any similar description.


-andy

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to