> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Newton <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2025 10:18 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: WG Last Call: 
> draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-
> epp-00 (Ends 2025-10-27)
> 
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
> links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> 
> 
> On 21-10-2025 9:25 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> >
> > [SAH] I could use some additional perspectives on this, people. Andy is 
> > saying
> MUST. Jim is saying SHOULD. More input would be helpful.
> 
> Unless I have missed something in the chain of RFCs, EPP relies on the urn
> namespace setup for IETF identifiers defined by RFC 3688. It says:
> 
>     NOTE: in order for a URN of this type to be
>     assigned, the item being registered MUST have been through the IETF
>     consensus process.  Basically, this means that it must be documented
>     in a RFC.
> 
> What have I missed?

[SAH] Nothing from the 3688 perspective, but there are ripple effects. Consider 
the following if we change the current "should" to "MUST":

A working group draft exists, and there are multiple production 
implementations. It uses IETF namespace URNs. The working group decides to stop 
work on the draft for some reason. The implementations remain.

ICANN requires the registry implementer to ask IANA to register this EPP 
extension in the IANA EPP extension registry as part of the Registry System 
Testing (RST) process.

IANA asks the designated experts to review the registration request. The 
template looks fine, but an expert notices the IETF namespace URNs. The expert 
tells IANA that the URNs MUST be registered.

IANA forwards that request to the XML registry experts, who reject the request 
because the specification isn't an RFC.

Does that mean that the request to register the EPP extension MUST also be 
rejected unless the URNs are changed?

Scott
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to