Hi all, inline...
On 04-11-2025 10:51 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
I had a chance to talk to both Andy and James while we're all in Montreal. Here's what I think we all agreed on. If I'm wrong, please make corrections. We want to update the draft to explicitly disallow the registration of Internet-Drafts or other "works in progress". Reference specifications should be considered "final", though they can be updated using the change process described in the draft. IETF URI namespaces MUST be reserved for IETF specifications. IETF XML namespace and schema URIs referenced in an IETF specification MUST be registered in the IETF XML Registry defined by RFC 3688 before a request to register an extension in the EPP extension registry will be accepted. Non-IETF XML namespace and schema URIs referenced in a non-IETF specification SHOULD be registered in the IETF XML Registry defined by RFC 3688, but that's not a requirement to register a non-IETF extension in the EPP extension registry.
I hate to be that guy, but... a SHOULD is to be followed by qualifiers (advisory for violation, etc...) otherwise it is just a preference (see the relevant IESG statement). Perhaps the advisory can be that registering into the 3688 registry is to avoid URI collisions (or claiming their use). -andy, as an individual _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
