On 10/24/25 09:19, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
OLD: URIs proposed in extensions (XML namespace and schema registration requests are commonly found in EPP extensions) should be evaluated for both syntactic and semantic correctness. For example, IETF namespaces should be reserved for IETF specifications. NEW: URIs proposed in extensions (XML namespace and schema registration requests are commonly found in EPP extensions) should be evaluated for both syntactic and semantic correctness. For example, IETF namespaces should be reserved for IETF specifications. URIs should be registered in the IETF XML Registry [RFC 3688] as appropriate.
Which IETF namespaces? And what are the reasons for is the should allow to be violated? Also, is there a reason why this registry doesn't just define columns for the XML namespace, schema identifiers, and the XML schemas? That seems like it would help with interoperability and sidestep any issues regarding RFC 3688 for those things that cannot be registered in that registry. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
