Werner,

Thank you for your support and I agree that there is the need for definitions 
and inclusion of the equation, which is Available Credit (AC) = Credit Limit 
(CL) – Balance (B).  Gavin’s response is helpful with aligning the definitions 
with those defined in the Registry Fee extension of RFC 8748.   The Registry 
Fee Balance is the negative of the Balance in the Balance Mapping with the 
equation Available Credit (AC) = Balance (B) – Credit Limit (CL), where the 
question is whether there is a desire to include all three variables.  When the 
AC is zero or negative a server MAY reject certain transactions.  Do you prefer 
having access to all three variables or the two that is included in the 
Registry Fee extension?

I don’t believe there is any intention with implementing currency conversion, 
so the currency returned is the currency that the account is kept.  I would 
like to learn more if currency conversion is a desired feature for the clients.

Thanks,

--

JG

[cid87442*[email protected]]curren

James Gould
Fellow Engineer
[email protected]<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email protected]>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>

From: "Werner Staub (axone)" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, December 4, 2025 at 3:24 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: Call for adoption: 
draft-gould-regext-balance-00 (Ends 2025-12-15)


Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.


I think the draft has great merit but I would argue that a definitions sections 
with the underlying financial definitions should be added to the document 
before adopting it.



Expressions like "credit", "credit limit", "balance", "available credit", 
"credit threshold" are not defined in the document and they are by no means 
clear just by virtue of definitions one could find in a dictionary.



When a balance is mentioned, it should always be made clear in whose favor it 
is. Is a positive balance one in favor of the server? What do each of these 
figures mean when they have a negative sign? Can the credit limit be negative 
so that the client would be require to maintain a credit balance with the 
server? (Note that I just used the word "credit" in a totally different sense.)



The equation linking "credit limit", "balance" and "available credit" should 
also be mentioned.



Even the tag "currency" requires clarification. The draft should make clear 
that it is necessarily the currency in which the account is kept. If that is 
not made clear, some implementations may use it designate the currency in which 
a converted balance happens to be expressed per client configuration. Of course 
"conversionBalance" and "conversionCurrency" tags would be better for the 
latter.



Best regards,

Werner




On 2025-12-04 16:35, Jody Kolker wrote:
I support adoption also.


Thanks,
Jody Kolker
319-329-9805  (mobile)



Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) with any feedback.

This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have 
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and 
permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its 
attachments.



________________________________
From: Eric Skoglund 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2025 3:09 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; Jorge Cano 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [regext] Re: Call for adoption: draft-gould-regext-balance-00 (Ends 
2025-12-15)

I support adoption. // Eric Skoglund From: Jorge Cano via Datatracker <noreply@ 
ietf. org><mailto:noreply@ ietf. org> Sent: 01 December 2025 18: 15 To: 
draft-gould-regext-balance@ ietf. org <draft-gould-regext-balance@ ietf. 
org><mailto:draft-gould-regext-balance@ ietf. org>; regext-chairs@ ietf. org 
<regext-chairs@ ietf. org><mailto:regext-chairs@ ietf. org>;
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
I support adoption.

// Eric Skoglund
________________________________
From: Jorge Cano via Datatracker <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: 01 December 2025 18:15
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [regext] Call for adoption: draft-gould-regext-balance-00 (Ends 
2025-12-15)


Subject: Call for adoption: draft-gould-regext-balance-00  (Ends 2025-12-15)

This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption for this document.

Abstract:
   This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
   mapping for retrieving the client balance and other financial
   information.

File can be retrieved from:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-balance/<https://secure-web.cisco.com/16e_pHDoinM1uLUp4G2RyOZpKR_g1PhVUIPkOdYwU7I3Z4WZ4RDEmfoWj6Y4bBwF2t2hcIzkGz0oPfIdP8O3X_QnHPIQLMhuq9hTEHdeIzfHz0glUihbRFm188D2D6a9yamxl_LvBZ94BWWyoP5Yuw0Y28V7vxuQf0TiA5ajJIcooV9L4aKhQqBn80RdMIp16M3yWQGEpZ3yDpFeKtSXx6HHRKXKVHh-I-PtOkOU8VZ55YK46ez4QbJWP3fc_RYf-x6d1hgHzoSotaQWYrblM6J8bIAfxqv8RYkFpMs1I6SzRqZEg-EAFFLTO0mx4mN7i/https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-gould-regext-balance%2F__%3B%21%21Hj18uoVe_Lnx%21uxuzeerzd1LT7rYoQYPvzScvaylRwEQ2OKrB7aRHL4ufx21umhG6_js3UULadhIoGT9jBovnvf9Ag7tR8WS7dc3r5ZObPHng%24>

Please reply to this message keeping [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> in 
copy by indicating
whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document.
Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated.

Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
found at [3].

Thank you.
[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1zLoM9qw90j7V4HlxmsrHkkgf3ao_UqLcVKHYUG2E7Dq4BSP4msor1-SstyQL3j582E_LrZsiJazQ_O5b6A4CS6dgpN5f41AyPS7bMbELEF5O4u4jD1bNF1YLoPI-al5LsngW4_vG2zTH3CfRRPaiXIYOFxksVwqqdgEo5LS31AuLnLf_D1kATJPVF5PxArHyIMuYo74Yj6Od4PhhI644P6kuHRsLqOmf86YkMskzhCen04MEFY0SaqGJOEkGfJsTCta9WUBCv58NhVFcaPIj-0HEz-g5dBtyR4SF0h_e4tvc_A6UuuAC23SpgxNIEbiB/https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fbcp78%2F__%3B%21%21Hj18uoVe_Lnx%21uxuzeerzd1LT7rYoQYPvzScvaylRwEQ2OKrB7aRHL4ufx21umhG6_js3UULadhIoGT9jBovnvf9Ag7tR8WS7dc3r5Xd7Z_tL%24>
[2] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1uJERsHYNkyNMf-YbgjXzIsKu_gh8VKkB72Thjqz-JTsIBcDP9rh6dmEwV3IuzE2YF0hZzmYhUo0-ERbX9Uczrh_u1T5A7kAiZwzn3wSNYbnvtFvnPUkWYs20ABhzC3ZxCtvzrJxv8Sb1xv-4FoKoUIW8TzOXe00xH2gt-fY-3Yj3oRY6OUXMOma346wdgQKT5bi1A3MF82JzOKZkMGVSFVWRYp7f0edOrmYBPVePjTJ0piPzUTpg_sBZK1EKlGoGGBabBAEMsX6sHwZjRolGnrsDSZ9VYe9fHzMFuRCvBdTCAcsvzkAl90O35TkDWsCm/https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fbcp79%2F__%3B%21%21Hj18uoVe_Lnx%21uxuzeerzd1LT7rYoQYPvzScvaylRwEQ2OKrB7aRHL4ufx21umhG6_js3UULadhIoGT9jBovnvf9Ag7tR8WS7dc3r5epWYYiK%24>
[3] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1EgflcRfdRH24YSQ0q5OmeWaYyJ4iBINHSlnDi2GK-hqHU1coNfhypPzumZzbnGy0wzsn6ZQM5hbjPILl6P5_zbS-BRKpcrHypGC7lgpfumvXssRUeBDRv6UJx-cSI9GeM9Zdk77l8owZebftl88nUSt-fFQYfHDnS9pU41lZaI8p85QRWHwKImdSG9YIySHsdmLx-4VvtFv9AcB8B7prJX9QjqrvZUZqtx7eBuCTzO8uN7fof7XS8niM_wUoMo95Y158rs1ceHRPCA8DwMNy_5W9zI2kUmcjVo0Hvcyy16Lf2Shbc_Q2RXh1IhWb4ZUa/https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Frfc6701%2F__%3B%21%21Hj18uoVe_Lnx%21uxuzeerzd1LT7rYoQYPvzScvaylRwEQ2OKrB7aRHL4ufx21umhG6_js3UULadhIoGT9jBovnvf9Ag7tR8WS7dc3r5cOwlBZX%24>



_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



_______________________________________________

regext mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

--

Werner Staub

Axone Services & Développement SA

2 cours de Rive

1204 Geneva

Switzerland

T: +41 22 312 5656

F: +41 22 312 5601

M: +41 79 203 4075
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to