On 1/13/26 1:46 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > My first take-away: I believe there was agreement that we want to have text > in draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp that clearly address the DE evaluation > criteria for proprietary extensions. That should include confirmation of > availability of a "permanent and readily available public specification", and > encouragement to register proprietary XML Schema and namespace URIs in the > IETF XML Registry. IETF namespace URIs MUST NOT be used in a proprietary > extension.
My take-away on this item was not "encouragement" but "requirement". "Encouragement" is what we have today and it is not working. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
