> -----Original Message----- > From: Gould, James <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 5:27 PM > To: [email protected]; Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: My 2026-01-13 REGEXT WG Interim > Meeting Notes > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > I believe that the guidance should be to encourage and not require, since the > purpose of the EPP Extension Registry is not to force uniqueness of XML > namespaces or XML schemas, but to publish the existence of a mature EPP > extension specifications. If there is the need for including the XML > namespaces used in the EPP extensions in the EPP Extension Registry, then > let's add that for visibility. I don't believe that proprietary EPP > extensions > should be allowed to use IETF namespaces and IETF XML schemas.
[SAH] We need more opinions here, people. I can't add text without a clear sense of consensus. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
