Il 17/06/2026 19:22, Gould, James ha scritto:
Andy,
I'll do a fresh review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-13 and provide
feedback. I don't believe draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions is ready for WGLC
until the versioning topic is fully addressed.
Thanks,
+1
I believe complete convergence between rdap-extensions,
rdap-x-media-type, and rdap-versioning is desirable.
I'd like to point out the inconsistency that seems most glaring to me.
Section 5.4 of rdap-extensions considers the case where an extension
might use a versioning method like that described by rdap-versioning.
But section 2 of rdap-x-media-type requires that the ext_list parameter
can only include extension identifiers.
This not only seems to me a clear inconsistence between the two
documents but eliminates the possibility that the versioning parameter
could be removed in order to make clients use only exts_list to signal
the desired extensions.
Best,
Mario
--
Dott. Mario Loffredo
Senior Technologist
Technological Unit “Digital Innovation”
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
Address: Via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
