Just for clarification draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions is not being held up 
based on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-versioning but based on an attempt to tackle 
the versioning problem in scope for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-versioning.  If we 
have overlapping, incompatible, and in cases competing approaches being defined 
in active working group drafts, we need to reconcile those ahead of one of the 
drafts moving to WGLC.  I have communicated the compatibility issues across the 
three working group documents (draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type, 
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-versioning, and draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions) 
numerous times.  

I posted the "Extensions Versioning Location Information and What Changes the 
Version Options 
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/XHyPXtm0fCFlnHeHEU_kr63cg7s/) 
message to the mailing list in the hope of discussing the options and 
preferences moving forward, but I have not received any responses yet.  Please 
review this message and respond to it with any additional options, your 
preference(s), and the reasons for your preference(s) so we can find a path 
forward.  

Thanks,

-- 

JG 



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
[email protected] 
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email protected]>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> 




On 6/18/26, 1:45 PM, "Pawel Kowalik" <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


On 18.06.26 14:44, Andy Newton wrote:
> Finally, it very unfair to the author team and the working group for you to 
> hold up this document based on your versioning draft. Since adoption, the 
> versioning draft has radically changed, moving from semantic versioning to 
> maturity versioning to point versioning and now a new theory called embedded 
> versioning. It is a meandering, moving target with a lot of complexity. So 
> that this does not spiral further, it would be best if the chairs stepped in 
> now.


+1


Pawel





_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to