Charles Eckel has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Seeing all the helpful points already raised by others in their reviews, the only additional comment I have is with respect to the reuse of port 700. I see the WG discussed and reached consensus to reassign the reference for UDP port 700 to the EPP-over-QUIC specification rather than assign a new port number, citing the absence of any known legacy UDP implementations. In order to safely accommodate any implementation that may exist now or in the future, it might be helpful to add a reference to RFC 9443 and mention that this mechanism can be used to demultiplex EPP over UDP from EPP over QUIC. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
