Scotty Henderson writes:
>Well let's look at it closely, and see who, as far as ["Vale"] goes, is
>racist (in the modern sense).
Unfortunately, Scotty, while I don't really disagree with your point, you've
made the mistake of posting quotes from a PC'd version of "Vale" into the
fray. This merely serves to further confuse an already grossly confusing
(and perhaps pointless) argument.
For example:
>You care naught that a man of your race has been foully done to death by
>these dogs - that I am their slave!
The original reads:
You care naught that a man of your own color has been foully done to
death by these black dogs - that a white woman is their slave!
and again:
>I am not such a dog as to leave a woman in the clutches of a savage
The original:
I am not such a dog as to leave a white woman in the clutches of a black
man
There's more, but these jumped out to me as being immediately wrong in your
quotes. And they were.
>I'll have to review the other two stories later. But these two reviewed, I
>just find blown out of proportion.
You'll have to review a better version than the one you chose for "Vale" if
you really want to make your point stick.
--
David Gentzel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pobox.com/~gentzel/
