Christian Gottschalch wrote:
> reeee !
>
> short question, is this the output from the known knfsd
> problem(nfs-cache) in /var/log/messages:
>
> Aug 1 15:35:27 filer3 kernel: vs-13042:
> reiserfs_read_inode2: [260 53161 0x0 SD] not found
> Aug 1 15:35:27 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:35:46 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [10 50931 0x0 SD]
> not found
> Aug 1 15:35:46 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:36:07 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [37 52266 0x0 SD]
> not found
> Aug 1 15:36:07 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:36:39 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [88 51057 0x0 SD]
> not found
> Aug 1 15:36:39 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:36:57 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [95 51431 0x0 SD]
> not found
> Aug 1 15:36:57 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:37:46 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [152 52958 0x0 SD]
> not found
> Aug 1 15:37:46 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:38:00 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [159 51863 0x0 SD]
> not found
> Aug 1 15:38:00 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:38:30 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [166 51968 0x0 SD]
> not found
> Aug 1 15:38:30 filer3 kernel: reiserfs: [CAN IGNORE: stale
> NFS handle] knfsd-fh-mismatch: reiserAug 1 15:38:49 filer3
> kernel: vs-13042: reiserfs_read_inode2: [191 52906 0x0 SD]
> not found
>
> so thats it, hope is another problem, because im using
> kernel 2.4.5 with umount and knfsd patch, thought its
> very stable and would use it for an production
> system........
>
There is absolutely nothing bad in these warnings. Latest code (2.4.7,
namely) does not warn about it.
Thanks,
vs
