Hans Reiser wrote:
> Hmmm, you didn't quite answer his question. Philippe, whether you use the -ac
> series or 2.4.10-pre4 is not a reiserfs issue, and we honestly don't yet know
> which is more stable in matters not reiserfs. Both should be equally the most
> stable thing available in regards to reiserfs. I know you want us to just
> tell you which to use, we can't, maybe the other list members have experience
> regarding the stability of the kernels in question in matters not reiserfs.
>
> Hans
Hi Hans,
I don't think Nikita didn't answered correctly.
I didn't ask wich kernel was the best to use overall but specifically
which one to use to have the best reiserFS issues.
I didn't know if the 2.4.10pre4 ReiserFS changes were the same than in
2.4.9ac7.
I went with the 2.4.9ac7 as there were some NFS updates from Trond and
Nikita told me the updates were the same in both kernel.
Everything has been working fine since the server was put into
production this morning. :o)
Thank you very much.
Philippe.
