Ed Tomlinson wrote: >Vitaly, > >I think Andrew could easily turn out to be right. > >How about adding a clause to your $25 per hour? > >"If, in our opinion, the bug turns out to be the result >of a reiserfs problem, all changes will be waived." > >Ed Tomlinson > >On January 27, 2002 06:49 am, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > >>>On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 07:48:05PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>it looks like a user error. We provide a support for $26 per hour. >>>> >>>You have got to be kidding! >>> >>No, we are not. >> >>>debugreiserfs *SEGFAULTED*. And it looks like he found 2 other bugs. >>> >>The latest utils do not segfault in the same case. Everyone should use >>ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/pre/reiserfsprogs-3.x.1b-pre1.tar.gz >> >>It is the best for now. >> >>>Everything he did looks 100% sane to me. >>> >>Except the fact that 2 reiserfs partitions disappered between the evening >> >>and the morning. This is not reiserfs bug: >> >>>>>neither new nor old reiserfs format found on /dev/archive/audio >>>>> >>BTW, RedHat charges more for the same. >> > > It was already there, read it. That said, RedHat and MS won't give you your $300 back if it turns out to be a bug.....
Hans
