On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 20:30 +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 18:22, Redeeman wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 16:55 +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 22:56, Redeeman wrote: > > > > hello.. reiser4 is now in mm, but i realize that nearly all of the stuff > > > > that was mm specific when the move to mm was made, are probably merged > > > > into upstream by now, i wonder, can anyone tell me exactly what from mm > > > > it depends on? > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > reiser4 got included into mm not because it needed something of it, but > > > rather because it is supposed that being in mm for certain amount of > > > time reiser4 will get a lot of testing and will prove that it is worth > > > to get included into stock kernel. > > im aware, however, the reiser4 patches in mm are against mm, which means > > it depends on something from it, and i'd like to find out what :D so > > that i can take it out and apply to vanilla along with reiser4 > > did you see ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9? > It contains all things which reiser4 depends on. nice > > If you would like to add reiser4 to vanilla kernel yourself you would > have to add reiser4 patches of mm kernel to vanilla one: > > people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.X/2.6.X-mmY/broken-out/reiser4-* > and add the patch i am attaching to this email. > yeah i tried that, however they dont patch against latest vanilla, it would seem the vfs has changed abit.. i just wondered if anyone knew exactly which of the mm patches was needed to make up for this, but, now you gave me that url :) never mind..
thanks -- Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
