Hello On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 11:28 +0200, Johan Isacsson wrote: > Hello, > > Unfortunately that output was not logged and it will take a couple of > hours to do a new check and get the output, but besides the specific > numbers in the following output which i found (after posting my help > request) in the mailing list archive the message i got was this: > [snip] > > Pass 0: > Loading on-disk bitmap .. ok, 61048992 blocks marked used > Skipping 10074 blocks (super block, journal, bitmaps) 61038918 blocks will be > read > 0%....20%....40%....60%.. > lef \ > left 0, 13223 /secccseccccc "r5" hash is selected > Flushing..finished > Read blocks (but not data blocks) 61038918 > Leaves among those 141109 > - leaves all contents of which could not be saved and > deleted \ > 5 Objectids found 414533 > > Pass 1 (will try to insert 141104 leaves): > Looking for allocable blocks .. finished > 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....Not enough allocable blocks, checking \ > bitmap...there are 1 allocable blocks, btw > > out of disk space > > Aborted > > [/snip] > > So i guess i should do as you replied to the person posting this and do > a dd to a bigger partition and do the rebuild-tree there? > Here is the reply to the older post: > > [snip] > > you need to get a larger partition, dd hdg1 there, run 'reiserfsck > --rebuild-sb' > on the copy to enlarge the fs size and after that run 'reiserfsck > --rebuild-tree' > on it. or you can enlarge the existent hdg1. > > Note: some disk space will be added to the current partition, if there was a > reiserfs before, that fs metadata will be mixed with the current fs. to avoid > > it, zero the added disk space first (dd if=/dev/zero ...) > > [/snip] > > I don't get the last part, if i do this and it works well i end up with > an OK file system on the other partition, should i completely wipe the > old partition before i dd it back to avoid problems? dd if=/dev/zero > of=/dev/oldpart? >
no You copied oldpart to bigger newpart. End of newpart which was not overwritten by oldpart should be zeroed. Keep oldpart intact until you have data restored on newpart. > Do you think there's any hope getting my data back? yes > Thanks for replying! > > /Johan > > Vladimir V. Saveliev skrev: > > Hello > > > > On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:15 +0200, Johan Isacsson wrote: > > > >> reiserfschk --rebuild-tree was aborted when it nearly had finished pass > >> 1 and now i can't mount the partition. > >> I no longer have the exact error message. > >> > >> Just before the filesystem got bad we had removed lots of data because > >> the disk got full. Df then reported that there was lots of space left on > >> that partition. > >> After that we had to power cycle the server because it got hung up and > >> after the reboot df reborted 100% usage and that some files couldn't be > >> read. > >> I den did a reiserfschk --check which said there wer fatal errors and > >> that i needed to do a rebuild-tree, which i did. > >> And after a long while it was aborted at about 90% of pass 1. > >> > >> I have the version 3.6.19-2 of reiserfs-progs (FC 4). > >> Of course i read about taking a backup after i had done the > >> --rebuild-tree :( > >> > >> > > Please, let us see complete reiserfsck --rebuild-tree output. > > > > >
