Matthias Andree wrote:
No, it is valid to run the test on commodity hardware, but if you (or
the benchmark rather) is claiming "transactions", I tend to think
"ACID", and I highly doubt any 200 GB SATA drive manages 3000
synchronous writes per second without causing either serious
fragmentation or background block moving.
You are assuming 1 transaction = 1 sync write. That's not true.
Databases and log filesystems can get much more out of a disk write.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
