> >I didn't mean to say your particular drive were crap, but 200GB SATA >drives are low end, like it or not --
And you think an 18 GB SCSI disk just does it better because it's SCSI? Esp. in long sequential reads. Jan Engelhardt --
> >I didn't mean to say your particular drive were crap, but 200GB SATA >drives are low end, like it or not --
And you think an 18 GB SCSI disk just does it better because it's SCSI? Esp. in long sequential reads. Jan Engelhardt --