On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jonas M. Gastal <[email protected]> wrote: > I tought the difference was only in the name, but seeing as the diference is > in the functionality I agree that "last closed tabs" is better. > About the awesomebar I think that is a complex thing that shouldn't be > rushed, in other words, I think we shouldn't do it for 0.3. > I think Elko is right we need a plan of what exactly we want to put in the > handbook, so that people can then do some parts of it. > Yes we have a wiki, it is at: > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/rekonq/index.php?title=Main_Page > I'm very impressed about our release going to so many distros, being a > gentoo user I guess I'll work on getting 0.3 in to gentoo's repositories > too.
I was going for a quick draft but I'm not allowed to create pages. I guess I would need to be added to the sf.net project. Could someone add me (or give my the right permissions) if it's not too much effort? My sf.net username is "kaboon_". -- With kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Eelko Berkenpies http://blog.berkenpies.nl/ _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
