On 09/25/2010 03:26 AM, Markus Slopianka wrote: > Can somebody please explain to me why since a while web browsers have to defy > GUI > standards? > It's bad enough that Rekonq doesn't have an optional menu bar. If in 0.7 tabs > are moved to > somewhere else than below the toolbar, I'll quit using Rekonq. I want a > coherent GUI > throughout my workspace and if some GTK-based browser ends up with a GUI that > follows the > KDE HIGs closer than a KDE app, I'll use that one. > > If you want tabs on top, use KWin's tabbing feature or use Chrome. > > You wanted our opinions. That's mine. > Markus Hi Markus, and thanks for your reply. I'd like anyway to say that I don't really understand your points. All the applications I use IMHO break what you call the "GUI standard". Can you explain me why amarok has 3 panels, but no mainview? And why okular has that strange bar on the left, instead of using a panel for? I ever wanted move it to the right part. Dolphin has this nice "address bar" that is not part of the toolbar. And so I cannot move it where I prefer. And where are menubar & statusbar in systemsettings? Wanna talk about konsole? Or about...
If I want tabs on top, I don't understand why I should use KWin's tabbing feature. Or Chrome. I can implement it on my self in rekonq. And I'm quite confident that in the way things will be, it will be a nice and improving feature, not just a tab move. If you wanna quit using rekonq you are obviously free to do it. What I'm sure I understand and I surely wont permit is someone trying blackmailing me/us saying something like "if you do/don't do this, I'll quit doing/using/saying that". Regards, Andrea. _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
