On Tuesday 04 January 2011 17:24:48 Pierre Rossi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 14:30, Benjamin Poulain > > > Can we consider moving back to gitorious? (or any system alike you > > prefer) and just mirror git.kde.org?
No :( While I'm one of the promoters of the discussion in k-c-d and it's perfectly clear to me that gitorious works really better than reviewboard, considering our workflow, I also am aware that we ARE a KDE project and I don't want to minimize the HUGE work done by our sysadmins implementing the git infrastructure. the gitolite + cgit choice is really good and while the reviewboard one is not so good as the others, I think we should work INSIDE the community to fix and improve the things we don't like and/or would better. I also think that, given a group of developers, let's say the "rekonq group", it should not be super hard implementing a system to automagically push/update a remote clone on reviewboard, adding in the description the name of the remote branch, so that the reviewer can (again, automagically) pull it. Last think I miss from gitorious is the ability for the reviewer to close the submitted/rejected requests. There are around 5 now in our reviewboard. This will improve our current workflow, IMHO at the level of the gitorious times, and will let us continue being an "innovative" group in the KDE community. Regards, -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rek...@freenode
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
