On Wednesday 05 January 2011 15:46:22 Benjamin Poulain wrote: > > Review board is oriented diff, what we need is something capable to > handle branches. > > Big changes on git are usually made of dozens of commit. Reading through > those commits gives you a better picture of the changes. Reviewboard > does not give such things.
I'm aware that reviewboard will never probably be 100% ok with git. I'm just saying that having it to "review the big picture" + having an automatic way to pull the remote request in a local branch seems enough to me. > You are assuming the sysadmin are willing to improve the process. Are > they part of a project using git so they can see the pain of the process > by themself? Yes. Obviously they will have more time to when all KDE core modules will be moved to git. (That is, after 4.6 release?) > I am not into politics, I don't really care where the code is hosted. I > would rather have something that works :) It's ok, I understood your intentions. The unique thing "politically oriented" I said anyway is that I feel part of the KDE community and I'd like rekonq being part of the SC. -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rek...@freenode
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
