> On Jan. 11, 2011, 5:10 p.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > I don't think this really solves the situation. You should probably limit > > the "recentlyClosedTabs" list, instead. > > Furkan Üzümcü wrote: > Isn't it used for the closed tabs section on New Tab Page? > If so people might want to get more closed tabs from there.
Yes, it is. But I think we'll have there the same performance problem you experience in the context menu. - Andrea ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100315/#review836 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 7, 2011, 8:29 p.m., Furkan Üzümcü wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100315/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 7, 2011, 8:29 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Summary > ------- > > After a lon rekonq session, you often have closed *a lot* of tabs. If you then > accidentaly closed a tab and you want to open it up, rekonq will freeze, while > the Closed Tabs context menu is loading. This is due to the many entries in > that menu. > Limiting the menu to 10 entries would make the situation better. > This also probably would solve the memory leak, that probably is caused by the > context menu. > > If I use rekonq for a long time, and then close a lot of tabs, the RAM usage > of > rekonq can go as high as 1.5 GB (yes, Gigabyte ;-)) > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=240356 > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tabbar.cpp 286d7d4 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100315/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > * Tested and works! > > > Thanks, > > Furkan > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
