On 01/11/2011 08:20 PM, ext Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> The more I read about this, the less I understand what is the >> revolutionary idea. :( >> >> Could you summarize that in an example? Let say I have a web app: >> "Google docs". It registers to the browser to handle .odt files and be >> available offline. >> >> What do you suggest on top of that? >> >> My point of view is the engine should add an icon for such apps (the >> user is asked for that of course), and the icon opens a chromeless >> browser window. >> If the same app is opened in the browser, it is not chromeless, it >> behave as usual window. > My idea is not to have "new windows for webapps". > > My idea is like the following: > You have one browser window with multiple tabs: > * GMail overview > * GMail write new mail > * Facebook page 1 > * Facebook page 2 > * Google Docs document 1 > * Google Docs document 2 > * 40 additional tabs with random browsing stuff > > What rekonq would do now is to add markers for GMail, Facebook and Google > docs, so that they are known to the Desktop Shell. The 40 random tabs are not > influenced. To decide what is marked for integration into the shell the > "Pinned Tabs" could be used (so it does not have to be a web-app). > > This is quite orthogonal to the "one window per web-application". It exposes > selected tabs to the desktop shell. It's nothing to replace the one window > approach (which I would like to have, but does not exist yet, so it's mood > point to discuss it) and even if the one window mode would exists it would not > influence this feature at all.
Ok, I had totally missunderstood the intent. That is an interesting idea indeed. cheers, Benjamin _______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
