So after reading the whole discussion i think Martin's last mail pretty much nails the feature that he is trying to explain, as for the idea itself, i think it would be awesome to have such a feature in rekonq and rekonq as a project should utilize this to the fullest extent.
Regards Rohan Garg On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Benjamin Poulain < [email protected]> wrote: > On 01/11/2011 08:20 PM, ext Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >> The more I read about this, the less I understand what is the > >> revolutionary idea. :( > >> > >> Could you summarize that in an example? Let say I have a web app: > >> "Google docs". It registers to the browser to handle .odt files and be > >> available offline. > >> > >> What do you suggest on top of that? > >> > >> My point of view is the engine should add an icon for such apps (the > >> user is asked for that of course), and the icon opens a chromeless > >> browser window. > >> If the same app is opened in the browser, it is not chromeless, it > >> behave as usual window. > > My idea is not to have "new windows for webapps". > > > > My idea is like the following: > > You have one browser window with multiple tabs: > > * GMail overview > > * GMail write new mail > > * Facebook page 1 > > * Facebook page 2 > > * Google Docs document 1 > > * Google Docs document 2 > > * 40 additional tabs with random browsing stuff > > > > What rekonq would do now is to add markers for GMail, Facebook and Google > > docs, so that they are known to the Desktop Shell. The 40 random tabs are > not > > influenced. To decide what is marked for integration into the shell the > > "Pinned Tabs" could be used (so it does not have to be a web-app). > > > > This is quite orthogonal to the "one window per web-application". It > exposes > > selected tabs to the desktop shell. It's nothing to replace the one > window > > approach (which I would like to have, but does not exist yet, so it's > mood > > point to discuss it) and even if the one window mode would exists it > would not > > influence this feature at all. > > Ok, I had totally missunderstood the intent. > > That is an interesting idea indeed. > > cheers, > Benjamin > _______________________________________________ > rekonq mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
