On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Benjamin Poulain <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/ > > src/history/historymanager.h<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/diff/1/?file=7140#file7140line79> > (Diff > revision 1) > > public: > > 79 > > return dateTime > other.dateTime; > > 79 > > return visitCount > other.visitCount && dateTime > other.dateTime; > > Just an idea... > What about a weigthed sum of both to determine the order? > > With an absolute measure of either one you can end up in those situations: > > priority visit: a web site visited 3 times 2 months ago will appear before > something you saw yersterday > priority date: something you saw yesterday appear before something you look > every day > > So it might be nice to take both into account? > > > - Benjamin > > On January 15th, 2011, 8:23 p.m., Lionel Chauvin wrote: > Review request for rekonq. > By Lionel Chauvin. > > *Updated Jan. 15, 2011, 8:23 p.m.* > Description > > Items in the completionlist are sorted by visit count instead of last visit > date > > Diffs > > - src/history/historymanager.h (a4099de) > > View Diff <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/diff/> > > _______________________________________________ > rekonq mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq > > Another possibility would be to have each visit weighted by how long ago it was, so more recent visits count more than visits a long time ago. So 1 visit today would count more to the ranking than 20 visits a year ago. It would probably be something like an exponential decay, so something you just visited a few minutes ago would be ranked very highly, while there wouldn't much difference between a site you visited 3 years ago and a site you visited 4 years ago. -Todd
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
