> On Jan. 15, 2011, 10:53 p.m., Benjamin Poulain wrote: > > src/history/historymanager.h, line 79 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/diff/1/?file=7140#file7140line79> > > > > Just an idea... > > What about a weigthed sum of both to determine the order? > > > > With an absolute measure of either one you can end up in those > > situations: > > > > priority visit: a web site visited 3 times 2 months ago will appear > > before something you saw yersterday > > priority date: something you saw yesterday appear before something you > > look every day > > > > So it might be nice to take both into account? > > Lionel Chauvin wrote: > I tried: > return (visitCount - other.visitCount) + > dateTime.daysTo(other.dateTime) > 0; > but it doesn't work fine. > Any idea ?
What about each item as: qreal ::relevance() const; Computed as : ln(visitCount) - ln(dateSinceLastVisit)? (count be negative...). So we have equal relevance with exponential decay? We can then weight one or the other to favor visit count or date? - Benjamin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/#review919 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 15, 2011, 8:23 p.m., Lionel Chauvin wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 15, 2011, 8:23 p.m.) > > > Review request for rekonq. > > > Summary > ------- > > Items in the completionlist are sorted by visit count instead of last visit > date > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/history/historymanager.h a4099de > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100396/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Lionel > >
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
