On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Benjamin Poulain <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100683/ > > I am not a fan of listing every option. When the author of adblock add an > option, we will need to update the code. > What about just one field: hasUnsupportedOption set to true if any option is > not used by the filter? > > Not to mention adblock already takes its share of memory. Don't forget those > field will be allocated for each rule. > > > - Benjamin > Is providing filter option support updates between official rekonq releases a possible use-case for Aaron's synchrotron framework? I know that would be something down the road, but it might be worth keeping in mind when setting up the system now. -Todd
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
