> On Aug. 23, 2011, 10:17 a.m., Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > I really like this feature, but it seems having problems on its 
> > implementation. Here is my result: 
> > http://wstaw.org/m/2011/08/23/url_strange.png.
> > Moreover there is the private mode problem and a strange effect moving from 
> > 2nd levels hosts to deeper ones. Check in example loading "kde.org" and 
> > then "git.reviewboard.kde.org". I think effect should be applied just on 
> > loadFinished.
> > Last, I really prefer Chromium behavior than Firefox one. I really don't 
> > understand their choice to show anyway the 2nd level highlighted.

obviously, the url is without the final dot: 
http://wstaw.org/m/2011/08/23/url_strange.png


- Andrea


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102402/#review5934
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 22, 2011, 11:18 a.m., Johannes Tröscher wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102402/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2011, 11:18 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> highlight host in urlbar like in firefox.
> this patch isn't finished yet.
> this code also evaluates the actual textrect including all margins, so the 
> "empty-progress==0" message will be drawn in the "real" center.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/urlbar/urlbar.cpp 17ba4bb 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102402/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> compiles and works.
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> 
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102402/s/238/
> 
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102402/s/239/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Johannes
> 
>

_______________________________________________
rekonq mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq

Reply via email to