Hi Barbara, There were two bugs in relax concerning jw_mapping.
The bugs were respectively 9238 (https://gna.org/bugs/?9238) and 9259 (https://gna.org/bugs/?9259) These were corrected in revisions 3298 (30-05-2007) and 3302 (20-06-2007). So, if your old version of relax was prior these dates, your old calculated jw_mapping results were erroneous. Sorry for the inconvenience. Have a nice day ! Sébastien Morin Barbara wrote: > URL: > <http://gna.org/bugs/?11823> > > Summary: non-reproducible data with reduced spectral density > mapping > Project: relax > Submitted by: bdanchec > Submitted on: Friday 06/13/2008 at 15:32 > Category: None > Severity: 4 - Important > Priority: 5 - Normal > Status: None > Privacy: Public > Assigned to: None > Originator Name: > Originator Email: > Open/Closed: Open > Discussion Lock: Any > Release: 1.2.13 > Operating System: Microsoft Windows > > _______________________________________________________ > > Details: > > Hi- > > I am having a rather odd problem with Relax. I used Relax last year to > calculate the spectral densities J(o), J(wN) and J(wH) for two proteins. This > year I wanted to use Relax to calculate the same dataset for a slightly > modified version of one of the proteins. I expected that the results would > be the same for all residues except for the three residues in which the data > changed (it's a 118 residue protein). Unfortunately I had to reinstall the > hard drive on my computer recently, and thus also Relax and all the other > programs. When I got everything up and running and calculated the spectral > densities, they were way off from what I expected for all residues. For > example, I originally got J(0) values between 0.01 - 0.07 ns/rad, but now I > am getting J(0) values between 0.28 - 1.2 ns/rad. To see if it was something > wrong in one of my input files, I recalculated the spectral densities I > calculated last year, using the same exact input files and everything as I > did last year, but those results now matched this new data (J(0) values > between 0.28 - 1.2ns/rad). The two datasets I ran today are the same except > for those three residues I changed, but the results are different from the > original results I obtained last year. Any thoughts on what is different > when I run these? I'm completely baffled.... any suggestions would be > great! > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://gna.org/bugs/?11823> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Gna! > http://gna.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-devel mailing list > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel > > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
