Hi Ed, As you say, it is of low priority. Thus, don't worry about it until you have time.
Moreover, the fix is fully ported to the 1.3 line (see r6665, http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=6665&view=rev) Regards, Séb Edward d'Auvergne wrote: > I think this should be a new release. But as it could be classified > as a low priority, I might leave this for next weekend as it takes > quite a few hours to do a release. Is this fix fully ported to the > 1.3 line as well? > > Regards, > > Edward > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Sébastien Morin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Consistency testing code changed slightly at revision 6611 >> (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=6611&view=rev). >> >> Consistency results are not affected by this change, but the absolute >> values of the F_eta function changed (by a factor of sqrt(3)). >> >> Does this change justify a new relax 1.2 release..? >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Séb :) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> relax (http://nmr-relax.com) >> >> This is the relax-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password >> reminder, or change your subscription options, >> visit the list information page at >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel >> >> > > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
