Hi Ed, That's ok. I understand, don't worry.
Thanks for keeping me informed. Regards, Séb Edward d'Auvergne wrote: > Hi, > > I must apologise for the delay in making a new relax release. There > are few infrastructure issues with gna.org which are in the process of > being sorted out (https://gna.org/support/?2059). Until then, it will > be a big struggle for me to get relax-1.2.14 released, so please be > patient. > > Cheers, > > Edward > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Sébastien Morin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I checked and the changes to the test suite were made in r6675 >> (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=6675&view=rev). >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Séb >> >> >> Edward d'Auvergne wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wasn't sure if all had been ported yet. Weren't there changes to >>> the numbers in the test suite? This may not yet show as the >>> consistency testing system test is not fully functional yet (I have >>> yet to convert the Monte Carlo simulation code to the new relax >>> design). >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Edward >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Sébastien Morin >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Ed, >>>> >>>> As you say, it is of low priority. Thus, don't worry about it until you >>>> have time. >>>> >>>> Moreover, the fix is fully ported to the 1.3 line (see r6665, >>>> http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=6665&view=rev) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> Séb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Edward d'Auvergne wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I think this should be a new release. But as it could be classified >>>>> as a low priority, I might leave this for next weekend as it takes >>>>> quite a few hours to do a release. Is this fix fully ported to the >>>>> 1.3 line as well? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Edward >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Sébastien Morin >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Consistency testing code changed slightly at revision 6611 >>>>>> (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=6611&view=rev). >>>>>> >>>>>> Consistency results are not affected by this change, but the absolute >>>>>> values of the F_eta function changed (by a factor of sqrt(3)). >>>>>> >>>>>> Does this change justify a new relax 1.2 release..? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Séb :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> relax (http://nmr-relax.com) >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the relax-devel mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password >>>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options, >>>>>> visit the list information page at >>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
