Hi Troels, For sanity reasons, what happens if you divide the maximum relax_time by 2.0? Do you see exactly the same result as would be expected?
Regards, Edward On 22 August 2014 14:53, <tlin...@nmr-relax.com> wrote: > Author: tlinnet > Date: Fri Aug 22 14:53:25 2014 > New Revision: 25218 > > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=25218&view=rev > Log: > Fix for time not extracted for CPMG experiments in target_function- > > bug #22461(https://gna.org/bugs/?22461): NS R1rho 2-site_fit_r1 has extremely > high chi2 value in systemtest Relax_disp.test_r1rho_kjaergaard_missing_r1. > > Modified: > trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py > > Modified: trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py > URL: > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py?rev=25218&r1=25217&r2=25218&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py (original) > +++ trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py Fri Aug 22 14:53:25 2014 > @@ -325,6 +325,8 @@ > cpmg_frq = cpmg_frqs[ei][mi][oi][di] > > # Missing data for an entire field strength. > + relax_time = max(relax_times[ei][mi][oi][di]) > + > if isNaN(relax_time): > power = 0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) > > This is the relax-commits mailing list > relax-comm...@gna.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password > reminder, or change your subscription options, > visit the list information page at > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list relax-devel@gna.org To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
