Hmmm, I'm now starting to wonder if some of the T_relax values in the
model equations should not be tau_CPMG :S

Regards,

Edward



On 22 August 2014 15:24, Edward d'Auvergne <edw...@nmr-relax.com> wrote:
> Well, because you propagate by the length of the relaxation time
> (exponentially) and then multiply the log of this by inv_relax_time at
> the end, they should cancel.  So my opinion in these numeric models is
> that as long as the relaxation time is not zero or does not cause the
> magnitisation vector to go to zero (i.e. the time is too too big),
> then absolutely any random time could be used.  I just randomly picked
> 2 here as that would still result in a reasonable number.  But you
> could try setting the relaxation time to a fixed value of 0.1, and I
> would assume that R2eff values will be correctly predicted.  If not,
> then there might be a bug somewhere in
> lib/dispersion/ns_r1rho_2site.py.
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
> On 22 August 2014 15:14, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlin...@nmr-relax.com> wrote:
>> Ehh.
>>
>> Say again?
>>
>> Why 2.0 ?
>>
>> 2014-08-22 15:01 GMT+02:00 Edward d'Auvergne <edw...@nmr-relax.com>:
>>> Hi Troels,
>>>
>>> For sanity reasons, what happens if you divide the maximum relax_time
>>> by 2.0?  Do you see exactly the same result as would be expected?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Edward
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 August 2014 14:53,  <tlin...@nmr-relax.com> wrote:
>>>> Author: tlinnet
>>>> Date: Fri Aug 22 14:53:25 2014
>>>> New Revision: 25218
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=25218&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Fix for time not extracted for CPMG experiments in target_function-
>>>>
>>>> bug #22461(https://gna.org/bugs/?22461): NS R1rho 2-site_fit_r1 has 
>>>> extremely high chi2 value in systemtest 
>>>> Relax_disp.test_r1rho_kjaergaard_missing_r1.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>     trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py
>>>>
>>>> Modified: trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py
>>>> URL: 
>>>> http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py?rev=25218&r1=25217&r2=25218&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py        (original)
>>>> +++ trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py        Fri Aug 22 14:53:25 2014
>>>> @@ -325,6 +325,8 @@
>>>>                                  cpmg_frq = cpmg_frqs[ei][mi][oi][di]
>>>>
>>>>                                  # Missing data for an entire field 
>>>> strength.
>>>> +                                relax_time = 
>>>> max(relax_times[ei][mi][oi][di])
>>>> +
>>>>                                  if isNaN(relax_time):
>>>>                                      power = 0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
>>>>
>>>> This is the relax-commits mailing list
>>>> relax-comm...@gna.org
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>>> visit the list information page at
>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
>>>
>>> This is the relax-devel mailing list
>>> relax-devel@gna.org
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>>> visit the list information page at
>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel

_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@gna.org

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel

Reply via email to