This is awesome news! Now the test suite is passing 100% on all major platforms (it should also pass for solaris, the BSDs, etc., anywhere Python and the python modules are installed). As for python specific change,
diff -uNr relax-1.3.5/relax relax-1.3.5.patched/relax --- relax-1.3.5/relax 2010-02-25 08:58:20.000000000 -0500 +++ relax-1.3.5.patched/relax 2010-02-25 09:01:26.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#! /usr/bin/env python +#! /usr/bin/env python2.X ############################################################################### # # I'm guessing you have python2.6 in the final version? I like these ideas for the released code as the C modules are often specific to the exact Python version there were compiled against. I've been thinking for a while about providing v2.5 and v2.6 compiled relax versions (for GNU/Linux and MS Windows). But how did you get scons to target a specific Python version? Cheers, Edward On 25 February 2010 22:20, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Edward d'Auvergne wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This failure is because it takes 201 iterations to reach the minimum >> compared to 204 with x86_64 hardware. I have now removed this >> iteration check as testing the values and chi-squared number is >> sufficient to see that the minimum has been reached. Could you update >> the repository copy (svn up) and check again? >> >> For the Fink specific changes to the scons/install.py file, is there a >> way of signalling that this is a Fink install rather than a normal >> install? Maybe I could add an scons target called install_fink so >> that you type: >> >> $ scons install_fink >> >> That way we can bring in these changes into the relax repository, >> something which might be useful for installing relax on Macs in the >> distant future. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Edward >> >> > > Edward, > The current relax 1.3 svn no longer shows any failures in the > testsuite when built under fink on powerpc-apple-darwin9. I'll > check the other arches in the next day or so. > As for adding the patches from fink, those are problematic. The > fink approach is to support python variants (hence the relax-py > package name that can build against the fink python 2.5 or 2.6. > The relax-py.patch basically... > > 1) patches the relax script so that python is called as python2.X > with the X replaced according which python fink is building relax-py > against. > 2) the generation of pyc files are suppressed in the scons/install.py > script because fink guidelines are not to package .pyc or .pyo files > but generate then from a postinstall packaging script. > 3) the sconstruct script is patched to allow the relax path to be > renamed relax-py2X to indicate which python relax was built against > and to install the binaries in the bin subdirectory of the fink > installation. > > The only way to handle this would be to have separate .fink versions > of these three files with the patches applied. This would be problematic > for sconstruct. > Jack > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
