Hi Edward,

Thanks for yours and Troels' kind help. I am trying to get the data on
second field.
I am still working with the test data and trying to analyze few residues
manually to check if the analysis is consistent.  I will update you once I
am satisfied with my analysis.

Thanks again,
Atul


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Edward d'Auvergne <edw...@nmr-relax.com>
wrote:

> Hi Atul,
>
> I have just returned from holidays, hence my late reply.  However
> Troels' reply should have fully addressed your questions and issues.
> Is the analysis now working for you?  Note that the spin-lock
> amplitude Omega_1 is the spin-lock field strength or nu_1, as you have
> supplied (converted using the factor of 2*pi).  Tilt angles and
> anything else the specific model requires are calculated from this and
> the difference of the spin's chemical shift and the experiment
> specific spin-lock offset.
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
>
> On 2 August 2014 09:52, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlin...@nmr-relax.com>
> wrote:
> > Dear Atul.
> >
> > I forgot one question.
> >
> > Do you have R1 data available?
> >
> > relax cannot currently do calculation without these measured values.
> > relax_data.read(ri_id='R1', ri_type='R1',
> > frq=cdp.spectrometer_frq_list[0], file= .....)
> >
> > I am about to try to also make it possible to fit R1 values.
> > sr #3135: Optimisation of the R1 relaxation rate for the off-resonance
> > R1rho relaxation dispersion models.
> > https://gna.org/support/?3135
> >
> > But that can take some weeks before it is implemented, and tested
> properly.
> >
> > Best
> > Troels
> >
> > 2014-08-02 9:47 GMT+02:00 Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlin...@nmr-relax.com>:
> >> Dear Atul.
> >>
> >> Welcome to the mailing list!
> >>
> >> This question is a very good one, and is not covered good enough in the
> manual !
> >>
> >> There has been a question related to this question on the mailing list
> recently.
> >> From Peixiang, at:
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user/1654
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user/1666
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user/1667
> >>
> >> Try to go through these post first, to cover the background.
> >> Don't get to confused, I will give you the answer below. :-)
> >>
> >> By asking here on the public mailing list, your question will
> >> potentially help any other users who would
> >> have the same question. And it will help us to turn our attention to
> >> the manual lacking a tutorial for R1rho models.
> >>
> >> For example this mailing list can be viewed here:
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user
> >>
> >> And searches in same mail directory can be done here:
> >> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user
> >>
> >> Your specific question is now listed here:
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.user/1718
> >>
> >> Edward can probably extend the your answer into details.
> >> I know, that he is on holiday for the next two weeks, so I can try to
> >> answer your question.
> >>
> >> I am a PhD student at the structural biology in Copenhagen, and have
> >> been working on the dispersion branch (CPMG and R1rho).
> >> So I will however do my best to try to help you in the meantime.
> >>
> >> ##### How to get help
> >>
> >> How to find help:
> >> The manual
> >> http://wiki.nmr-relax.com/Manual
> >>
> >> Related to: Relaxation Dispersion:
> >> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Relaxation_dispersion.html
> >>
> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Relaxation_dispersion_optimisation_theory.html
> >>
> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Analysing_dispersion_in_prompt_script_UI_mode.html
> >> http://www.nmr-relax.com/manual/Dispersion_model_summary.html
> >>
> >> It seems we have a problem, that setting up R1rho experiments is not
> >> covered in well the manual.
> >>
> >> Then I see that you have found the folder with sample scripts.
> >> The sample script at:
> >>> cat sample_scripts/relax_disp/R1rho_analysis.py
> >>
> >> Did you know, that you can get help to all the functions?
> >>
> >> You can start relax, and see the help information this way:
> >>> relax
> >>> help(sequence.read)
> >>> help(spectrum.read_intensities)
> >>
> >> But what you are looking for is this:
> >>> help(relax_disp.spin_lock_field)
> >>> help(relax_disp.spin_lock_offset)
> >>
> >> Or go to the GUI, and in the top select:
> >> user functions (n-z) -> relax_disp -> spin_lock_field
> >>
> >> ---------
> >>
> >> Relax has something called "system tests", which make sure that all
> >> functions of relax is kept when changing the code.
> >>
> >> Try opening the setup of one of these systemtests:
> >>> gedit test_suite/system_tests/relax_disp.py
> >>
> >> And search for "def setup_r1rho_kjaergaard".
> >> Skip all lines with:
> >> - self.assertEqual
> >> Delete all:
> >> - self.interpreter
> >>
> >> Here you can get another way to inspire you how to setup things.
> >> Test data resides in:
> >> cd test_suite/shared_data/dispersion/Kjaergaard_et_al_2013/
> >>
> >> And have been analysed by:
> >>
> http://wiki.nmr-relax.com/Tutorial_for_Relaxation_dispersion_analysis_r1rho_fixed_time_recorded_on_varian_as_sequential_spectra#Intro
> >>
> >> So back to your question.
> >> You mention spin-lock amplitude.
> >> This is in relax called "spin-lock field" or " spin-lock field
> strength".
> >>
> >> If we set in the setup:
> >>
> >> -----
> >> # In MHz.
> >> yOBS = 81.050
> >> # In ppm
> >> yCAR = 118.078
> >> centerPPM_N15 = yCAR
> >> -------
> >>
> >> # So for varian giving offset in Hertz, and relax wants in ppm:
> >>
> >> # Calculating the spin-lock offset in ppm, from offsets values provided
> in Hz.
> >> frq_N15_Hz = yOBS * 1E6
> >> offset_ppm_N15 = float(deltadof2) / frq_N15_Hz * 1E6
> >> omega_rf_ppm = centerPPM_N15 + offset_ppm_N15
> >>
> >> # Set The spin-lock offset, omega_rf, in ppm.
> >> relax_disp.spin_lock_offset(spectrum_id=sp_id, offset=omega_rf_ppm)
> >>
> >>
> >> For this experiment, we first had to do a calibration experiment to
> >> find how the lock power translated into field strength.
> >> That results is written into a python dictionary in the setup:
> >>
> >> spin_lock_field_strengths_Hz = {'35': 431.0, '39': 651.2, '41': 800.5,
> >> '43': 984.0, '46': 1341.11, '48': 1648.5}
> >>
> >> # Looping over file with all settings:
> >> dpwr2slock = line.split()[3]
> >> spin_lock_field_strength = spin_lock_field_strengths_Hz[dpwr2slock]
> >>
> >> # Set The spin-lock field strength, nu1, in Hz
> >> relax_disp.spin_lock_field(spectrum_id=sp_id,
> field=spin_lock_field_strength)
> >>
> >> I hope this helps!
> >>
> >> Please write back here to the mailing list, if the answer covers your
> question.
> >>
> >> Good luck!
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Troels Emtekær Linnet
> >> PhD student
> >> Copenhagen University
> >> SBiNLab, 3-0-41
> >> Ole Maaloes Vej 5
> >> 2200 Copenhagen N
> >> Tlf: +45 353-22083
> >> Lync Tlf: +45 353-30195
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-08-01 19:42 GMT+02:00 Atul Srivastava <asriv...@umn.edu>:
> >>> Dear Edward,
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to use 'relax' for the off-resonance R1rho
> >>> constant-relaxation-time relaxation dispersion using R1rho_analysis.py
> >>> script available as sample script with relax.
> >>>
> >>> The following is the section where I have question:
> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> data = [
> >>>     ['900MHz_reference_3000.list',    'ref_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_1.list',
> >>> None, 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_2100.list',    '2100_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_2.list',
>  2100,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_2728.list',    '2728_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_3.list',
>  2728,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_3357.list',    '3357_reso_R1rho_ubi_4.list',
>  3357,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_3985.list',    '3985_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_5.list',
>  3985,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_4614.list',    '4614_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_6.list',
>  4614,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_rep_4614.list','4614_rep_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_10.list',
> 4614,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_5242.list',    '5242_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_7.list',
>  5242,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_5871.list',    '5871_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_8.list',
>  5871,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000],
> >>>     ['900MHz_6500.list',    '6500_off_reso_R1rho_ubi_9.list',
>  6500,
> >>> 118.275, 0.320,  900.21422558574e6, 90000]
> >>> ]
> >>> # Loop over the spectra.
> >>> for id, file, field, offset, relax_time, H_frq, rmsd in data:
> >>>     # Load the peak intensities and set the errors.
> >>>     spectrum.read_intensities(file=file, dir=DATA_PATH, spectrum_id=id,
> >>> int_method='height')
> >>>     spectrum.baseplane_rmsd(spectrum_id=id, error=rmsd)
> >>>
> >>>     # Set the relaxation dispersion experiment type.
> >>>     relax_disp.exp_type(spectrum_id=id, exp_type='R1rho')
> >>>
> >>>     # Set the relaxation dispersion spin-lock field strength (nu1).
> >>>     relax_disp.spin_lock_field(spectrum_id=id, field=field)
> >>>
> >>>     # Set the spin-lock offset.
> >>>     relax_disp.spin_lock_offset(spectrum_id=id, offset=offset)
> >>>
> >>>     # Set the relaxation times (in s).
> >>>     relax_disp.relax_time(spectrum_id=id, time=relax_time)
> >>>
> >>>     # Set the NMR field strength of the spectrum.
> >>>     spectrometer.frequency(id=id, frq=H_frq)
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> I have supplied the spin lock offset from the center of the spectrum
> in Hz
> >>> for "field".
> >>> And the center of spectrum in ppm as 118.275 ppm for "offset".
> >>> However, I wonder where the value of spin-lock amplitude is to be
> provided
> >>> as it is indispensable for the calculation of spin-lock effective
> field. I
> >>> have acquired my data with spinlock amplitude 1500 kz with different
> offset
> >>> values for 15N spin.
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know that at your earliest convenience.
> >>> Thanks for your time and consideration.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>> Atul
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
> >>>
> >>> This is the relax-users mailing list
> >>> relax-users@gna.org
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
> >>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
> >>> visit the list information page at
> >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
> >
> > This is the relax-users mailing list
> > relax-users@gna.org
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
> > reminder, or change your subscription options,
> > visit the list information page at
> > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
>
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-users mailing list
relax-users@gna.org

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users

Reply via email to