With 24 hours to go from the cut off deadline for 3.30, I don’t think this is a good idea; this can wait for 3.30.1, and might as well use the appropriate fix. Most distros will ship that version anyway.
Ciao, Emmanuele. On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 17:13, verdre <ver...@v0yd.nl> wrote: > I have an alternative solution which would be more compatible with > changes we'll make in the future, could this one also get an approval? > > It's even less intrusive than the other one since there's no need to > stop initially hiding the label. > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/215 > > Thank you, > verdre > > On 02.09.2018 02:37, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > > > > I'll give a hesitant +1 to this one, since the change is small. > > > > If you consider it important enough for a 3.30.0 freeze break, rather > > than waiting three weeks for 3.30.1, then it should also important > > enough to backport to 3.28. It would be nice to see this fixed there too. > > > > Thanks for solving it, > > > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > release-team@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions. > -- https://www.bassi.io [@] ebassi [@gmail.com]
_______________________________________________ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
