This is the appropriate fix, it's not going to get any better. But I understand if you don't want to ship it so close to the deadline.
Thanks, verdre > With 24 hours to go from the cut off deadline for 3.30, I don’t think this is > a good idea; this can wait for 3.30.1, and might as well use the appropriate > fix. Most distros will ship that version anyway. > > > Ciao, > Emmanuele. > > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 17:13, verdre < [email protected]> wrote: > > I have an alternative solution which would be more compatible with > > changes we'll make in the future, could this one also get an approval? > > > > It's even less intrusive than the other one since there's no need to > > stop initially hiding the label. > > > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/215 > > > > Thank you, > > verdre > > > > On 02.09.2018 02:37, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > I'll give a hesitant +1 to this one, since the change is small. > > > > > > If you consider it important enough for a 3.30.0 freeze break, rather > > > than waiting three weeks for 3.30.1, then it should also important > > > enough to backport to 3.28. It would be nice to see this fixed there too. > > > > > > Thanks for solving it, > > > > > > Michael > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > > Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions. > > > -- > > https://www.bassi.io > [@] ebassi [@ [gmail.com](http://gmail.com)] _______________________________________________ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
