On 7/6/07, Troy Unrau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The proposal is to add another layer to the release stack called 'gamma' or > similar. The release cycle up until Oct 23rd would remain unchanged, except > perhaps the RC sections might need to be renamed as gamma candidate, for > instance.
Sorry for bringing up this question again, but I have the impression that old-style "release when ready" supporters got shut up too often now. As a russian saying states, do not call the devil your brother... Why inventing names instead of shifting the schedule by 3 months? > We will do the > marketing to ensure that the opensource community knows that they can use > the gamma while preparing a big splash for 4.0.0 three months later. Why don't just let people more time to code to ensure 4.0.0 is good instead of doing marketing? PS: I do know all the reasons why 4.0 has to be shipped in October already _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
